Quantcast
Channel: vice
Viewing all 425 articles
Browse latest View live

Pesta Kuliner dan Arus Mudik Terbesar Sedunia Saat Imlek

$
0
0

Artikel ini pertama kali tayang di MUNCHIES.

Beberapa waktu lalu, tanpa sengaja saya bergabung dengan migrasi paling banyak melibatkan manusia sedunia. Saya membeli tiket kereta berbarengan dengan musim paling padat penumpang, di negara berpenduduk terbesar sedunia. Tiket itu terbeli karena saya terlalu abai melihat kalender. Sontak, saya terkejut melihat lautan manusia di salah satu stasiun Kota Shanghai yang menjadi lokasi transit kereta. Saya terpukau menyaksikan jutaan manusia tumpah ruah dalam satu tempat, masing-masing menjalani rute berbeda-beda.

Bayangkan saja ilustrasi kepadatannya seperti ini: seluruh populasi Amerika Serikat (sensus terakhir menyatakan jumlahnya 322 juta orang) memadati kereta selama satu bulan penuh. Inilah yang terjadi di Cina saban menjelang dan sesudah Imlek. Skala arus mudik di Tiongkok jauh lebih masif dibandingkan Indonesia. 

Angka 332 juta orang itu baru penumpang kereta saja. Sebelum dan sesudah Imlek, diperkirakan 2,9 miliar orang pulang ke kampung halaman masing-masing di seantero Tiongkok. Jumlah itu bahkan melebihi angka penduduk resmi Cina yang kini mencapai 1 miliar lebih sedikit. Jumlah pemudik Imlek di Cina membengkak, karena para perantau di Malaysia, Singapura, hingga Taiwan turut pulang ke kampung halamannya. Perayaan Imlek yang biasanya berlangsung 15 hari itu semacam simbolisme, menandai kewajiban etnis Tionghoa di manapun agar kembali menemui keluarga; mempererat simpul yang kendor dengan tanah leluhur.

Mobil pick up penuh kotak oleh-oleh Imlek. Semua foto oleh penulis.

Ada satu pemeo Cina yang akan diucapkan banyak orang selama Imlek: ren shan ren hai. Artinya, "gunungan manusia, lautan manusia." Kalimat itu benar belaka saat saya menyaksikan kondisi Stasiun Hongqiao di Shanghai yang sepenuhnya berisi manusia berdesak-desakan.

Seumur hidup, saya belum pernah menyaksikan manusia berkumpul di satu tempat sebanyak itu. Semuanya membawa koper besar, kotak penuh makanan, dan barang bawaan lain. Kesan sumpek bertambah berkali-kali lipat. Kebanyakan orang membawa jeruk, buah yang menjadi simbol persatuan keluarga besar. Kue beras (yang sangat populer di wilayah selatan Cina) juga banyak dibawa sebagai buah tangan oleh para pemudik. Orang Cina menyebut kue beras sebagai nian gao. Makna harfiahnya adalah "semoga semakin bijaksana dan sejahtera di masa mendatang."

Walaupun berstatus warga AS peranakan Cina, semua pemandangan itu tetaplah membuat saya terbengong-bengong. Imlek yang dirayakan di Los Angeles dulu hanyalah makan malam bersama ayah dan ibu. Begitu saja sudah. Kami akan merebus sayuran, daging dan bakso ikan. Sesekali saya dan kakak akan memperoleh angpao dalam amplop merah, lalu menghabiskannya membeli jajanan. Tidak pernah, sekalipun, saya harus berdesak-desakan naik kendaraan umum menemui sanak famili. Keluarga Wei, marga ayah saya, tampaknya tidak segigih marga lainnya dalam urusan pulang kampung saat Imlek.

Kini, saya harus menjalani perayaan sebagaimana miliaran warga Cina lainnya. Selama satu minggu penuh, saya naik tiga kereta ke rute berbeda-beda, ditambah dua kali naik bus, demi menemui tiga keluarga berbeda-beda yang menggelar sajian pesta khusus menyambut Imlek.

Pesta terbesar tentu saja dihelat ketika Hari H Imlek. Untuk 2017, momen tahun baru Cina dirayakan pada 28 Januari, sesuai kalender bulan yang dimiliki orang Tionghoa. Persiapan memasak setiap keluarga biasanya dilakukan sejak seminggu sebelumnya. Dua hari menjelang hari H, saya berada di Kota Jinhua, Provinsi Zhejiang. Jaraknya 326 kilometer dari Shanghai. 

Saya ditampung oleh keluarga Sherry Zen. Setibanya di rumah mereka, saya segera melihat satu ekor babi utuh sedang dipanggang. Usus babi berlumur saus kecap dijemur di teras rumah. Di sisi rumah yang berbeda, kulit ikan juga dijemur setelah digarami. Saya pun melihat satu ember kecil berisi dua ekor ikan yang masih hidup ada di pojokan. Saat merayakan Imlek, wajib hukumnya ada olahan ikan. Orang Cina menyebut ikan sebagai yu, yang sering digunakan dalam frasa nian you yu. Artinya "kemakmuran di tahun mendatang."

Di dalam dapur, bakso buatan sendiri sedang direbus dalam panci raksasa. Bakso itu dibikin oleh Paman Sherry. "Bakso sebaiknya tersedia di meja makan saat Imlek, karena bentuknya bulat. Kami menyebutnya yuan," kata Sherry. Pepatah Cina menyatakan tuan tuan yuan yuan. Maknanya adalah "persatuan seluruh anggota keluarga."

Liur saya menetes melihat semua makanan itu. Terbit pula rasa iri dalam hati. Keluarga orang tua saya tampaknya melupakan sama sekali tradisi ketika dulu memutuskan bermigrasi dari Taiwan menuju AS. Saya dan saudara kandung lainnya tidak ada yang mengetahui cara membuat sosis, wonton, atau proses mengeringkan usus babi. Di rumah keluarga Sherry, saya seperti diajari lagi cara menjadi orang Cina sejati.

Keluarga dari berbagai generasi lambat laun berdatangan tanpa henti ke rumah Sherry. Mulai dari kakek, nenek, paman, bibi, keponakan, sampai entah siapa lagi. Setiap tamu akan kami suguhi wonton dan pangsit. Ini praktik yang populer di kalangan warga selatan Cina. Semua tamu makan lahap. Ada kepercayaan, bahwa semakin banyak bersantap selama Imlek, maka rezeki kita tahun depan bakal bertambah. Nenek Sherry makan banyak sekali. Beberapa sanak famili memintanya berhenti mengunyah. Mereka khawatir perempuan 91 tahun itu jatuh sakit karena berlebihan menyantap panganan.

Keluarga yang menjadi tuan rumah tidak akan bekerja sendirian. Para tamu, termasuk paman atau bibi mereka, ikut mempersiapkan masakan. Paman Sherry turun tangan langsung membumbui dan membakar daging. Mereka bisa menjelaskan dari mana asal bahan baku seluruh masakan tersebut. Ada daging babi sumbagan rekan kerja, ada kue beras bikinan kota sebelah, serta sayuran yang ditanam di halaman belakang rumah. Pengetahuan soal sumber bahan baku ini penting dalam tradisi Cina. 

Pada Hari H Imlek, saya telah berpindah kota lagi. Di puncak perayaan, saya berada di Kota Nanxun, semacam kota air kuno seperti Venezia yang memiliki banyak kanal. Saya datang ke sana diundang oleh keluarga Christine Liu. Mereka tidak keberatan orang asing seperti saya turut serta menyantap masakan dalam pesta Imlek keluarga.

Sajian di kediaman Liu gila-gilaan. Ada 15 jenis menu, diakhiri satu hot pot ukuran jumbo. Semuanya hasil olahan sendiri, tidak ada yang hasil membeli jadi di restoran. Setiap makanan yang disajikan juga punya simbolisme tertentu.

Contohnya, kukusan teratai yang dihiasi beras ketan. Sesuai pemeo klasik, ou duan si lian. Maknanya ikatan keluarga tidak akan berakhir walaupun raga terpisah berjauhan.

Sajian lain yang menyita perhatian saya adalah pangsit isi telur. Makanan ringan ini melambangkan emas dan harta dunia. Udang dimasak aneka rupa menghiasi meja makan, sebagai simbol tawa dan kebahagiaan. Makanan penutup di rumah Liu adalah beras padat (semacam tumpeng) yang disebut ba bao fan. Jika diterjemahkan, berarti "penuh". Nama ini melambangkan, lagi-lagi, pertalian keluarga yang diharap sanggup bertahan sepanjang masa. Kata ini menurut saya juga cocok menggambarkan kondisi perut selepas menyantap sajian sebanyak itu.

Sesudah makan enak, keluarga Liu asyik menonton siaran televisi CCTV, stasiun televisi milik pemerintah Cina yang ditonton sedikitnya 700 juta orang. Ini adalah saluran televisi paling banyak ditonton di seluruh dunia. Anda pikir siaran final Piala Champion sudah mencetak rekor? Jangan naif. Jumlah pemirsa televisi tentang liputan Tahun Baru Cina jauh melewati siaran Final Piala Dunia sepakbola sekalipun.

Kota air Nanxun

Di tengah malam Imlek, ketika berusaha tidur, saya tiga kali terbangun. Semua orang menyalakan petasan. Saya sempat mengira Kota Nanxun sedang dibombardir dari udara. Saat mengintip jendela, langit diwarnai kembang api.

Pada saat orang bersuka ria itulah, saya tiba-tiba kangen rumah di Los Angeles. Imlek di tanah leluhur memang membuka mata saya tentang banyak hal. Tapi bagaimanapun ini pertama kalinya saya berkunjung ke Cina. Saya belum pernah menikmati makanan penuh simbolisme semelimpah ini. Dari sisi makanan saja, terlalu banyak yang bisa ditulis. Merayakan imlek di Cina tentu saja mimpi basah para jurnalis kuliner.

Masalahnya, perasaan saya tiba-tiba kosong. Saya rindu orang tua. Saya segera mengirim pesan pada mereka, mengucapkan selamat Imlek. Hanya sepersekian detik, ayah balas mengirim satu link. Ketika diklik, muncul gambar amplop merah berisi banyak uang.

Hanya melihat gambar itu saja, saya segera merasa bahagia. Jauh-jauh lebih berbahagia.

Saya tak lagi kesepian.

Ikuti petualangan Clarissa Wei mengunjungi berbagai provinsi seantero Cina di sini.


Tipul ăsta e un justițiar virtual care îi avertizează pe alții că pot fi furați de hackeri

$
0
0

Dacă lași deschisă o bază de date pe internet, cineva sigur o s-o găsească. În ultimele săptămâni, hackerii au asaltat mii de servere publice care folosesc softuri de bază de date, cum ar fi  MongoDB și Hadoop, iar apoi cer o taxă în schimbul informațiilor furate.

Aparent, cineva a simțit nevoie să facă ceva în privința asta și alertează administratorii că bazele de date sunt vulnerabile în fața unui atac.

„Pare un avertisment prietenos", spune Victor Gevers, membru al organizației non-profit GDI Foundation, care dezvăluie problemele de securitate. Gevers a urmărit atacurile malițioase încă din decembrie anul trecut, iar luni el a început să observe o deviere relativ ciudată.

Un justițiar virtual avertizează adminii de baze de date înainte să fie hackuiți

Hackerii scanează internetul de baze de date care nu cer autentificare pentru a se loga, fac o copie și apoi șterg toate informațiile. După care, ei trimit un mesaj de șantaj, unde cer o răscumpărare în schimbul fișierelor.

Dar, acest justițiar, oricine ar fi el, creează un folder gol în bazele de date deschise, numit „your_db_is_not_secure". Până acum, acest mesaj a fost amplasat în 49 din cele 2 641 de baze de date care folosesc softul Cassandra, a spus Gevers pentru Motherboard.

Încă nu e clar cât de eficientă este abordarea asta de informare a potențialelor victime, ținând cont că administratorii de baze de date ar putea nici să nu observe mica schimbare.

Gevers a scris recent într-o postare pe Twitter că Fundația GDI a început să informeze victimele prin mail, iar un alt grup de experți în securitate au încercat să trimită emailuri automate către potențialelor ținte ale hackerilor.

Dacă aceste mesaje nu ajung la deținătorii de baze de date, atunci poate ajunge mesajul de răscumpărare.

Traducere: Diana Pintilie

Citește mai multe despre hackeri:

Tot ce trebuie să știi despre hackeri și cum să te protejezi de ei pe internet

Faceți cunoștință cu colectivul de hackeri misterioși cărora le place să troleze anonim

Noua armată de hackeri a Marii Britanii ar putea schimba cursul războiului cibernetic

When Chemotherapy Saves Your Life, but Leaves You Infertile

$
0
0

When Becki McGuinness was diagnosed at the age of 21 with osteosarcoma, an aggressive form of bone cancer, she was anxious about the impact treatment could have on her future fertility. "If I'd known then what I know now, I would have pushed further," she says, "but my concerns were brushed off by the doctors."

Now 30 years old, and infertile as a result of the intensive chemotherapy that saved her life, McGuinness is campaigning to ensure all young cancer patients have access to the fertility options she was denied.

"A fertility specialist told me later that there had been enough time to save my fertility before I started treatment, but I feel like [the cancer specialists] made the choice for me," she adds. "Being young and infertile is such a hard thing to take. There's no chance for me now; once you're infertile you can't go back."

Cancer treatment, and particularly chemotherapy, can have this devastating impact on women like McGuinness because "the drugs are designed to kill cells which are dividing," explains Dr. Anne Rigg, a consultant oncologist at Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital. "It affects your hair follicles, the cells in the lining of your cheeks and, for pre-menopausal women, your ovaries."

The extent of the impact, she adds, will depend on the type of cancer, how aggressive your treatment is, and your age when you start treatment. "For a 25 or 35-year-old, it would be much less likely to cause infertility than in a 45-year-old, because they'll have younger ovaries which will be less damaged by chemo," Dr. Rigg says. "Not all chemotherapy drugs do affect fertility, but the cocktail of drugs used for cancers like lymphoma and sarcoma is particularly aggressive."

Read more on Broadly

Envision: más que un festival, una alternativa de vida ante tiempos inciertos

$
0
0

Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en Thump, nuestra plataforma de música y cultura electrónica. 

Las tarjetas de presentación han ido quedando poco a poco en el pasado. Mientras unos se presentan a sí mismos con palabras, existen otros, como la banda de Envision en Costa Rica, que prefieren hacerlo a través de hechos; en este caso, a través de su festival anual.

En Envision, la celebración y la música se usan como medios para acercar por unos cuantos días a la gente al modo de vida sustentable que llevan el resto del año los involucrados en el proyecto. Un proyecto de vida que integra todos los pilares fundamentales del desarrollo humano para vivir en armonía girando en torno a un eje principal: la comunidad.

No te confundas, aun cuando el enfoque principal de este festival es la naturaleza, la alineación musical no deja de ser sorprendente, con Opiuo, Acid Pauli, Blon:Ish, Nicola Cruz, entre otros abanderando la escena electrónica en el evento.

Desde sus inicios como una pequeña fiesta de 500 personas hasta convertirse en una comunidad referente de vida sustentable y permacultural en Centroamérica y el mundo, detrás de esta idea se encuentra Matt Siegel, CEO de esta comunidad tropical.

Platicamos con él acerca del porqué este tipo de festivales son importantes en estos momentos de crisis social, sobre la esencia del festival, lo que viene nuevo para esta siguiente edición y sobre su participación en el esperado Global Eclipse Gathering en agosto —una fiesta de una semana en Oregón donde colaboran 11 festivales del mundo y donde se podrá apreciar un eclipse solar total—.

Fotografías: tomadas de la página oficial de Envision

Thump: ¿Cómo nació el Festival Envision?
Matt Siegel: Fue de hecho una cuestión de serendipity, un encuentro de varios grupos de personas haciendo cosas increíbles a la vez alrededor del mundo. Yo estaba viviendo en Estados Unidos en ese tiempo, me dedicaba a las finanzas pero después del colapso financiero fui a Costa Rica con los otros dos cofundadores, Jess y Justin, buscando tierras y socios para producir un festival ahí. Nos recomendaron buscar a Josh, quien había producido un concierto en un campo de futbol soccer un año anterior, pues seguramente tendría buenas conexiones. Fuimos a su restaurant y de casualidad estaba ahí esa noche —él vive en una granja permacultural en las montañas—. Nos invitó a su cuarto y nos quedamos hasta las 4 de la mañana hablado de esta idea de un festival.

El conocía a Stephen Brooks y Sarah Wu que son dos de los otros fundadores. Ellos son los gurús de la permacultura en Centro América, tienen una increíble escuela de permacultura en el Caribe. Josh quiso incluirlos en la parte educativa de las cosas y de pronto, tuvimos este equipo perfecto. Josh en la parte de conocimiento de producción, yo tenia el background de negocios y marketing; y Stephen tenía el lado educativo, así que nos juntamos y nos pusimos a trabajar. Eso fue en noviembre de 2009 y produjimos el primer evento en marzo del 2011.

Platícame un poco de la evolución y crecimiento del festival. ¿Ha sido notorio el incremento de asistentes a este tipo de eventos?
Definitivamente no ha sido fácil. Ese primer festival fue en el patio trasero de uno de nuestros socios. Y digo, todos teníamos alguna experiencia en producción de eventos pero ninguno había producido un festival en forma. Ese primer año tuvimos 400 o 500 personas. Fue pequeño, teníamos un pequeño escenario de bambú y la vibra fue increíble. Nació esa esencia de Envision, que se quedó con nosotros durante todo este tiempo. 

Lee la entrevista completa en Thump.

Photos of Hustlers and Hooligans Awaiting Trump’s ‘Economic War’ on Mexico

$
0
0

This article originally appeared on VICE Canada.

President Donald J. Trump has been in office for just over a week, and already the view from south of the American border looks grim. Threats to dismantle trade deals and impose import taxes have been called a looming "catastrophe" for Mexico's economy.

In El Tapatio, a slum on the outskirts of Mexico's second largest city Guadalajara, economic uncertainty and drug hustling go hand in hand. Life moves more slowly than the bustling city surrounding the community, but for José Marquez, 19, work never ends.

Marquez lives in a two-room concrete home with his mother, wife, and their two children. Next door lives his friend and business partner, Martin.

Jobs are scarce in El Tapatio, and without the ability to read or write, Marquez's options are limited. He travels to Zapopan, a neighboring municipality most days of the week to wash cars at intersections for change, and sells weed and meth with Martin to make enough money to feed his children.

Martin, 23, covers his face from the camera because he's worried I may be involved with the police.

Marquez, 19, retrieves a soccer ball from his two-room house to kick around as they wait for clients on a Tuesday afternoon.

Marquez's wife Janet worries that if more jobs leave Mexico, her children will be more likely to get involved with drugs and join cartels.

"It seems like America is ready to wage economic war on us. There are very few jobs right now and if more of them leave, people will inevitably get involved in drugs, because it offers opportunity," she told VICE.

Janet laughed when she was asked about the prospect of America building a wall along the Mexican border.

"I don't know why they would want to keep Mexicans out when we go to their country to work and provide services," she said. "We have so few restrictions to keep Americans out of our country that it just seems like a double standard."


Jesús shows off a tattoo of the Mexican coat of arms.

Trump, however, made steps toward one of his signature campaign promises on Wednesday by signing an executive order to start construction on his "great wall" along the U.S. and Mexico border, according to Reuters.

As Martin and José take part in a friendly game of soccer with some neighborhood children, waiting for clients, they play in the shadow of a wall plastered with graffiti which reads "Trump loves Peña," referring to a perceived romantic relationship between the new American president and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto.

Asked about his perception of Trump, Marquez shook his head and scoffed. Despite a language barrier, he managed to communicate that he thought the new president was a "crazy idiot."

See Chris Donovan's work here.

What It's Like Being a 20-Something Funeral Director

$
0
0

This article originally appeared on VICE Canada.

Lauren LeRoy gets a lot of surprised looks when she tells people what she does for a living. The 26-year-old doesn't look the part of your stereotypical funeral director, but she has done more than a 1,000 funerals in her six-year career. She has witnessed her share of familial graveside disputes—and been on the receiving end of some unusual postmortem requests.

VICE spoke with her about mortuary makeup, weird smells, and what it's like to deal with death all day (and all night) long.

VICE: When did you know you wanted to be a funeral director?
Lauren LeRoy:
I have known since I was 12 that I wanted to be a funeral director. My great-aunt and great-uncle owned their own funeral home, so I would go over there a lot and there wasn't anything odd about it, because they lived above. It was a normal thing. When I was 12, my grandfather passed away, then my great uncle [who owned the funeral home] passed away within eight months of one another. So having those deaths occur—especially my grandfather's passing—that one affected me really hard, because he was the man in my life. That's when I decided I wanted to be a funeral director, even if I didn't know everything that it meant at the time.

Has this career affected your dating life?
If I was not married, I would say yes. I've been with my husband since I was 15. He's always known what I've wanted to do, and he's so unbelievably supportive it's not even funny. I don't have a schedule. Everything that I do is up in the air, so it means that a lot of things he does are up in the air as well. I think if I wasn't with him that dating for me would be extremely difficult. I like being home, after having a stressful day or just working for so long, I just want to come home, sit on the couch and relax. I don't know how I would meet somebody—I wouldn't have the energy to go out and meet somebody.

How much of your job is mediation among warring family members?
A lot. But you do what you can with everybody. I have a job to do as a funeral director, and I have to do that job. I can't get in the middle—it's hard. I'm not a lawyer, I'm not a counselor. When it comes down to it, sometimes you have to step back and let family members take care of things themselves.

Any pet peeves?
My job is to give people information, so I don't have any pet peeves when family members choose to do one thing over something else. If I have a pet peeve it may be other funeral directors in the industry not wanting to go along with change. I know some funeral directors say they don't want to do personalization [of services], so that's going to affect us all. People think of funeral directors as a whole. So if one does something bad, it really affects everybody.

Photo courtesy of Lauren LeRoy

Has this job enabled you to better contend with your own mortality?
I grew up in a Catholic household. I've always had my religion be the center of my life. I've always believed there was something more, I've never believed that that was it when you died. I don't know if the job itself has helped that or not, but what being a funeral director has done for me is not take any day for granted. I bury old people and I bury babies and young people. You never know what tomorrow is going to hold. If anything, it's taught me to take each day as it comes, and make the most of each day.

Favorite part?
The people that I meet. I always say I meet the best people, it's just during one of the most difficult times in their lives. I get to hear really fantastic stories about how people lived their lives, and I just love people. That's why I do what I do.

Least favorite?
Probably the unpredictability. I can't necessarily schedule things like normal people. It's kind of a joke among my family—if I get an invitation to something, it's like, I'll be there if someone doesn't die. I like the unpredictability in a sense because every day is different and I never get bored, but it makes planning things for your own life very difficult.

What do you wish people knew about funeral directors?
That we're not scary! [laughs] I think when people think about funeral directors, they think of the Addams family. Don't get me wrong, I wear black every day, but funeral directors aren't these morbid death-loving people. I just wish people knew that funeral directors are normal people, just like everybody else.

Are you seeing more women enter the field?
My official graduation date was 2010, and the majority of my class was actually female. It was really great. I feel like the female presence is just larger now, you definitely see a lot more.

What funeral music is in heavy rotation these days?

"You Raise Me Up" by Josh Groban is one I get requests for all the time. Also, "In the Arms of an Angel" by Sarah McLachlan, I hear that so many times. We have a couple of CDs we keep in our back pocket. I don't know why, but our funeral home gets a lot of Elvis fans, so we have this one inspirational Elvis CD that we have on hand all the time. They'll come in like; "Mom was a huge Elvis fan...." Well, we have the CD for you.

Any unusual requests?
I'm never stunned by anything. I don't judge anyone or anything, whatever you want is OK. I had this one guy whose son passed away. They gave us his outfit to lay him out in for the visitation. This guy was in his early 20s. His parents wanted to have him cremated. At the end of his visitation, his dad comes up and says, "OK we want his clothes back." I said; "so you want him to be cremated in nothing?" And he's like, yeah. I never know the reason why people request something. I'm just the funeral director, so whatever you want—as long as it's reasonable and doesn't hurt anyone—I'll do that for you.

Do any funerals stick out in your mind?
Two in particular. One I will never forget. It was during the visitation itself. It was a young woman who had passed away from breast cancer. She was only a couple of years older than me at that point. We had prepared her and got her ready. The girl was in her casket, and I just remember watching her father walk up to her casket. He put his hand on her and he just started talking to her. And that broke my heart so bad. I walked away because it was such a beautiful moment between this father and his little girl—it just made me think of myself and my dad. It was so in the moment, just spending time talking to her. That will stick with me for a long time.

Another one was a couple years back, a baby had passed away. The baby was about a month old and was very sick. The parents had set up the nursery with butterflies—that was the theme of the nursery. The baby never ended up coming home, and passed away in the hospital.

When we went to the cemetery, the priest was saying the final prayers, and I actually had to interrupt him, because suddenly, all around us, were a dozen butterflies. No one had released them—they had just appeared there. I said, "Sorry Father, but is everybody seeing this right now?" After that, I had the family come back to the funeral home and they said that seeing those butterflies made them feel that their baby was at peace.

How do you prep for this career?
In high school I took public speaking because I figured that would be something I would be doing a lot of. Every state has different rules for how to become licensed. In NY State where I practise, you need to have an associate degree in funeral services, and then you have to take a national board exam in science and art—two separate exams that cover everything you've learned in mortuary school. Once you've passed those, you have to do a year of residency under a licensed funeral director. So basically, he monitors your embalming, meeting with families, removals, things like that. Then after your internship, you have to take a New York State law exam in public health law. When all is said and done, it's about a three year process.

Is the pay good?
The pay can be good, but normally it's not that great. If you own your own funeral home, that's when you're living a better lifestyle. If you're just an employee with the funeral home, it's not the best pay. You're not working a normal forty hour work week. A lot of funeral directors are salaried. When I factored in my salary compared with the 60 hours a week I was actually working—I could have made more working at McDonalds. You don't become a funeral director to make a lot of money, let's put it that way! [laughs]

Do all funeral directors do embalming?
All in NY will learn how to embalm, not all will end up practicing that. I've been licensed for six years now, I only embalmed my first three years. Now I meet with families, do arrangements, things like that. You basically choose what route you want to go down. I know funeral directors who do both because they work for a small funeral home and they have to do it all.

Is there a limit [from the time of death to the time of embalming them]?
There's not in New York State. It's better to embalm a body as close to the time of passing because you get better results.

What do you mean?
The blood hasn't had a lot of time to settle and pool. It makes a person look more natural, it makes a huge difference. I've worked on bodies where it's been close to a week (since time of death). Their body has had longer to shut down, decomposition may have set in. So it's more work. I don't think any funeral director likes that—it's a smell you never forget, but it's a smell that I can't describe. It hits you in your face almost, when it's really bad. You just do what you can. You remember that, no matter what's going on, this is a person. They may have been dead for a little bit, but it's still a person.

Have you seen any trends emerge?
The entire nation is seeing a rise in cremation. I work in the Buffalo area, with an older clientele. They are very much in that traditional mindset, where they've had a cemetery plot for years already. That's what their parents had, that's what they're comfortable with.

For the younger generation—baby boomers and younger—a lot of cremation, just because it comes down to cost (it's a lot cheaper). The younger generation doesn't talk about their mortality very much, so they don't have cemetery plots. If you don't have that available, that cost can be so huge for families, that cremation seems like an easier way to go. It's really just personal preference. I know a lot of people who don't want to be cremated because they don't like the idea of being burned, and I know a lot of people who don't want to be buried because they're claustrophobic.

What does a person need to do this job well?
You have to be compassionate. You can't come into this career and not care. This is not just a job you can go through the motions with. You have to want to serve other people and help them through a very difficult time. Because a lot of times you are putting these families above your own. If you don't have that mentality, you won't last in the field.

Follow Tiffy Thompson on Twitter.

How to Sext, According to Some Sexperts

$
0
0

Photo by Pro Juventute via Flickr

This article originally appeared on VICE UK.

Sexting has become part and parcel of modern flirting. All the kids are at it, but the less said about that the better, because it's very, very shaky ground legally. For the adults, though, it's perfectly fine. It comes in many shapes and forms: it can go well, it can go incredibly badly, and it's something fun to look back on when you're bored on a long train journey.

But sexting is, in many ways, an art form, and some people's paint palettes are more colourful than others. To help you expand your range we asked a few sexperts for their sexting tips. Spoiler: there's a lot of stuff about how you shouldn't send a sweaty, grainy photo of your turgid boner, the skin pulled back to the base to emphasise the length. Oddly, people don't want to see that sort of thing.

MARGARET CORVID, JOURNALIST AND DOMINATRIX

"If we're talking about two civilians, not sex workers, the main thing is to make sure your sexting is welcome, to make sure you have consent from your sexting partner, that it's OK to have a sexy conversation. You don't have to be all serious when asking for consent, either—you can just send a little text: 'Do you mind if I talk dirty a bit ;o),' for example, before you go ahead saying I'd like to do this, I'd like to do that.

"If you have consent from your partner then the next part is what are you actually going to say? Most people draw a blank on that. The best suggestions that I've found for dirty talk, whether it's verbal or sexting, is say what you would like to do and imagine you're both engaged in a sex act together. You do not need to be coming up with some elaborate fantasy with fully-fledged characters. You can just say, 'I would really love to suck your cock right now,' or whatever. That's just a very basic example. It doesn't have to be wildly creative, just expressive.

"If I'm sexting with someone, I'm not going to come out with some wild fetish or kink if I don't know that the other person will be into it. There's strange kinks people have, like stepping on balloons, and I'm not just going to start talking about that."

JILLIAN ANTHONY, SEX COLUMNIST, 'TIME OUT NYC'

"Don't go too hard right away. Stick to things that you know. If you're feeling a little unsure about what to say you can just read through in your mind what your general foreplay is. You can describe coming home, or starting to kiss them—things like that—and it can progress as it normally would. That way you don't have to imagine things too much and you can just go with what you know. Sexting has no age. It may be a different form of communication for [older people], but if you've been in a long-term relationship and you're a little older it's a great way to get excited about your relationship and get excited about going home.

"I'm wary to say 'don't ever do this' because each situation is different, and each coupling will be different. People will like different things. Personally, I don't like it if it's so literal. It can be awkward all the way around if it's so literal, like, 'I am now undoing your [pants].' Have a little fun with it.

"Not everyone wants to see a dick pic immediately. Test the waters, check out how that's going, make sure that you guys are on the same page with that."

WENDY JONES, AUTHOR OF 'THE SEX LIVES OF ENGLISH WOMEN'

"People have always written to each other in sexual ways—sometimes very subtly, but it's still been there, in the 17th, 18th, 19th century. It's just that it's manipulated by new technology. We've always used it, we've always understood it.

"The most important thing about sex is to enjoy it fully, and sexting and texting is a great place to be creative with language. You can be very subtle or very crude, put the volume where you want it. Obviously anything you commit to paper or electronic devices is recorded and can be used and you can be manipulated by it or shamed by it; you're committed to it. That's a boundary you have to be aware of, and doesn't it add to the frisson anyway? It's a more concrete expression than the spoken word. Listen to your instincts and don't ignore it because it's the wisest part of your system.

"Spelling makes you look intelligent. Make sure you've got the right number! Seduction is better than being too explicit. Implicit is sexier than explicit, even though you're sexting. And it doesn't just stop at sexting—it should lead onto something else; some other fulfilment."

This image is called "Does it count as sexting if it's a drawing?" and is by Quinn Dombrowski via Flickr

BRIDGET PHETASY, SEX COLUMNIST FOR 'PLAYBOY' MAGAZINE

"I would say make sure you trust the person, first of all. The most important thing is knowing that it's going to be reciprocated—you don't want to come out of the gates sexting and then miss the target. Start slowly. I feel like these things kind of unfold naturally. You'll be in a conversation and then suddenly you'll be sexting, and it usually happens when you're dropping hints and the other person gets the hint and takes it to a more racy place. I think that people are smart enough to know a hint when you drop one. I think that women and men are sensitive to it. You know when somebody's suddenly shifted into a flirty place.

"For a man, don't send dick pics. Unless they're requested, just don't do it. Never do it. Don't get greedy, don't beg for nudes. For women, I would say be sensitive to the time of day you're sexting. He might be in a meeting. Somebody might be in a lunch. One time, some guy sent me a dick pic and I was looking at my phone at work. My friend got sexted a second-hand dick pic, which is never a fun experience. It's one thing if you're a couple and you're like, 'Babe, I have a quick meeting today,' and you're sexting him knowing that because it's something you do to add to the tension. But if you've been sexting with someone and he's been in a meeting and he doesn't get back to you and then you get angry, I guess it's like: don't be hypersensitive if they're not responsive right away.

"One other thing is don't ask questions you don't want to be answered. Guys are always like: 'Did you take that for me?' Men and women all have, like, stock photos of your best pictures. You might be feeling ugly that day and send a stock one... but if you want to make someone feel special, it's important to take things just for them. If you're just flirting then take a bunch just for them. But inevitably the good ones end up as your stock photos anyway. These are just for you... for now. One time this guy was like, 'Take a picture with a spoon,' or licking a spoon, or something like that. It was a way for him to know it was just taken."

@joe_bish

More from VICE:

Do Teens Actually Use These Sex Acronyms? An Analysis

How Sexting Is Changing Our Sex Lives IRL

A Sex Club for Bisexual Women Left Intimate Photos of Its Members Freely Accessible Online

Evgeni Malkin's Top 100 Snub Is a Damn Travesty

$
0
0

"The 100 Greatest NHL Players" for all its pomp and circumstance is a marketing tool for the league. It's important to extract as much enjoyment as possible from this without getting too angry about the snubs that littered the list revealed in Los Angeles on Friday night.

Everyone on the "Blue Ribbon" panel who curated the list, however, should have to answer for the omission of Evgeni Malkin because there's no excuse for it on any level.

There were a handful of decisions that will leave you shaking your head, but Malkin—who coincidentally withdrew from the All-Star weekend Wednesday when it was announced he had a lower-body injury—failing to make the cut calls into question the legitimacy of the list, the panel and the league itself.

Why even bother if you're ignoring Malkin?

Let's consider all the subjective reasoning that could be used for placing someone on this "esteemed" yet arbitrary list, and how Malkin passes with flying colors in all of them.

Read more on VICE Sports.


Protests Close Out Toronto Bar Where Owner and Employee Are Charged with Gang Sex Assault

$
0
0

On Friday night, College Street Bar's doors were locked, dark curtains blocked its front windows and a handwritten note on its door announced it would be temporarily closed. This was the same case—save for the note—on Thursday night too, despite its website stating open hours between Thursdays through Sundays every week.

The closure comes after its owner and an employee were appeared in court this week, both charged on four counts of gang sexual assault, trafficking a schedule 1 substance and forcible confinement.

It's been just over a month since Gavin MacMillan, 31, and Enzo De Jesus Carrasco, 41, (the owner and the employee respectively) allegedly drugged, sexually assaulted and trapped a 24-year-old woman inside the bar from the evening of December 14 until the morning of December 15.

While the men were first arrested the day after the alleged assault, they were released on bail on Christmas Eve and the bar reopened a week later for New Year's Eve.

The day before the alleged suspects were released, protesters held a peaceful demonstration in front of the bar. This past month has seen locals expressing anger with the establishment remaining open and reportedly egging the bar's front windows.

College Street Bar Friday. Photo by the author

Located in Toronto's Little Italy, College Street Bar is a spot that's popular for its flair bartenders, and live music. But instead of its regular Friday night crowd last night, a small group of protesters were standing outside the bar, this time celebrating a victory. Protesters told VICE the bar had been open last week.

As they held signs advocating for a safer service industry, some teared up with joy and other's yelled, "We believe her."

The demonstration was organized by a local advocacy group called the Sexual Assault Action Coalition. On Thursday, Viktoria Belle, one of the group's co-founders, met with Toronto Councilor Mike Layton about their concerns with College Street Bar remaining open.

"Right away, [Layton] said he would to put a motion together to have their liquor licence and their live music licence taken away," Belle told VICE. According to Belle, the Alcohol and Gaming Commision of Ontario (AGCO) are now reviewing and the bar's liquor and business licenses.

"College Street Bar should be closed until after the trial and [when] there's a verdict met because it has remained open to the patronage without any sort of transparency or any knowledge of what's going on inside or who's working the bar," Belle told VICE.

Read More: How Rape Complainants Are Having Their Social Media Feeds Used Against Them in Court

Service industry workers say the alleged sexual assault is not an isolated case. Neesha Temple, one of the protesters and a current service industry worker, told VICE the industry must do more to protect employees.

"I've been assaulted in this industry before and it's unfortunate to say that I did keep my mouth shut and I didn't feel like I had a voice," Temple said. "It's really unfortunate that, when we want to let loose on a Friday night, this is what happens."

The alleged assault at College Street Bar comes after changes to Ontario's Occupational Health and Safety Act required employers to implement protocol for dealing with sexual harassment and assault in the workplace. As establishments continue to fail these provisions, service industry workers and activists including the Sexual Assault Action Coalition plan to bring awareness of these very prominent issues to Toronto's government.

Follow Ebony on Twitter.

Photos of People Having a Good Time

$
0
0

This article is part of our VICE Weekends summer series, presented by Weis

Pat Casten is an up-and-coming photographer out of Melbourne. Over the summer, she took a stack of photos of her friends, chronicling small moments from much longer days. Her portraits are an ode to being completely yourself—a shameless celebration of having a good time and not caring too much. 

These photos are of time spent catching some vitamin D on a rooftop in South Yarra, doing DIY shoots in a backyard in Brunswick, and dancing at an outdoor rave in St Kilda as the sun sets. It's all the best parts of summer. 

You can follow Pat Casten on Instagram

This article is presented by Weis

This Guy Loves His 13,000 Pens

$
0
0

Kristine Wathne is a young, talented artist living in Norway who is currently studying photography for her undergrad. Her first book, Mania, came out earlier this year and documents seven people and their strange collections of ultra-tight jeans, wedding dresses, Thai souvenirs, 50s paraphernalia, and pens, among other oddities. She says the project "was driven by a fascination for the atypical—of collectors, fetishism, and subculture." Here's a taste of what's inside the book.

Kristine Wathne is a photographer based in Trondheim, Norway. You can follow her work here.

Arve Møllevik has been collecting 80s clothing for more than 20 years. In his closet, he has about 100 pairs of jeans and unisex tights. The tighter, the better, he insists.

Jan Roger Elstad wanted to do something that he thought no other man had done before. He had seen a pile of wedding dresses in the trash and saved them. Then, in 1991, he started buying his own and storing them in his basement. He now owns more than 400 wedding dresses.

Harald Haraldsen travels whenever he gets the chance and has been to more than 46 countries. He dedicated the largest section of his extravagant and souvenir-laced living room to his favorite nation, Thailand, which has visited at least 60 times. A model of a Thai temple sits in the middle of his floor.

Karl-Erik Johansen has devoted his life and home to his love of the 50s. When he was nine, he began purchasing LPs, and in time, it became all he spent his money on. As he got older, though, his mother gave him an ultimatum: If he wanted to stay in her house, he had to stop his collecting habit, because it was taking up far too much room. He moved out immediately, with his 70,000 LPs in hand. “I don’t feel the need to have a wife or kids," he told Wathne. "This is my life, and I’m loving it.”

Maria Toftum became obsessed with royalty when Princess Diana died in 1997. Now, she constantly looks around for royal effects and runs 20 Facebook groups—with a total of 10,000 members—where she posts photos of dead kings and queens.

Ole Elvis Andersen’s fascination with Elvis Presley has been growing since he was 12 years old. In 1992, Andersen legally added Elvis as his middle name, since everyone was just calling him Elvis anyway. His very religious parents would tell him again and again that he would go to hell if he didn’t stop listening to rock music. He didn't listen.

Rolf Ressem owns more than 13,000 pens, which he stores in boxes, suitcases, and, for the best ones, file folders. He's part of a club of pen enthusiasts that includes 400 like-minded people around the world. A few years ago, Ressem tried to beat the Guinness World Record for the largest collection of pens. Officials counted his pens for more than 48 hours, but sadly he was two short.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Immigration Order, Suspending Deportations

$
0
0

A federal judge in Brooklyn blocked part of an executive order that President Donald Trump signed Friday barring visitors from seven Muslim-majority countries. The emergency stay, issued Saturday night, temporarily prevents people arriving at U.S. airports with valid visas from being deported.

The ruling, issued by Judge Ann Donnelly of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, temporarily stalls President Trump's plan to block visitors—including visa and green card holders—from Syria, Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Iraq, Sudan and Libya for 90 days. The order also suspended the refugee resettlement program for four months.

But on Saturday, Judge Donnelly halted the deportations ruling "there will be substantial and irreparable harm to refugees, visa-holders, and other individuals from nations subject to the January 27, 2017 Executive Order."

When Judge Donnelly granted the stay, the courtroom erupted in cheers but she immediately shouted "No! No!" and the room returned to silence.

The American Civil Liberties Union estimated that the stay will temporarily spare 100 to 200 people from deportation. After the ruling, ACLU asked if their clients would be put in detention until their status was resolved. U.S. Attorneys seemed not to know. Judge Donnelly said, "If someone is not released, I guess I'll just hear from you."

Read the rest over at VICE News.

How Your Job and Music Taste Affects What Booze You Drink

$
0
0

(Top photo: Pixabay user kaicho20, via)

This article originally appeared on VICE UK

I've worked behind bars on-and-off for much of my adult life, and while serving booze to different sections of society I've noticed that, generally, each has an unspoken drink of choice. At rock and metal gigs it'll be lager and craft ales; at Soca nights it's brandy with a single block of ice; for TV production company Christmas parties it's endless gin and tonics.

Trying to guess what customers are going to order is always a fun way to break through the monotony of pouring liquid into a glass for eight straight hours, and it makes you wonder how these drinking patterns emerge. Surely the same people don't head home after the club and eat the exact same food, smoke the same cigarettes and use the same toothpaste?

Dr Thomas Thurnell-Read, a lecturer in Cultural Sociology at the University of Loughborough, edited a book called Drinking Dilemmas: Space, Culture & Identity, which covers the drinking habits of various chunks of the population. I caught up with him for a chat.

VICE: Firstly, how much research has gone into group drinking habits?
Dr Thomas Thurnell-Read: There's a long history of interest in this in academia, and anthropologists have long been fascinated by how alcohol plays particular roles and functions in different parts of society. In the 1930s there was a study by [research organization] Mass Observation where they sent out observers across a northern city they called "Work Town"—which we later found out was Bolton—to study the habitual nature of drinking and what it tells us about a community and how they live their lives. There was a deep interest in the minutiae of the drinking setting from a social perspective. In the last few years the world of sociology has been increasingly drawn to returning to these themes of collective drinking and social habits around alcohol.

How much of what we drink is linked to socioeconomic factors, beyond, say, only super rich people being able to afford expensive bottles of wine?
Academic interest, media interest and political debate is often focused on working class drinkers and how they drink, and middle class drinkers have long been invisible in these debates. You can trace a lot of this concern with working class drinkers back to the 19th and 20th century, with mass industrialization and urbanization. The ruling classes had concerns with how productive the labor force was—as in, if they're spending all their time in the pub drinking, is this going to be a threat to factory work and productivity? I think gender and social class have long been the most important divisions in our understanding of how we drink and the role alcohol plays. There is still a double standard where we widely accept that men drink heavily, or that drinking heavily is a particularly masculine thing to do, but women drinking heavily or drinking in public tends to challenge our binary notion of gender. Women who drink heavily, or in a particular way, may be subject to social taboo or social pressures.

Are we social chameleons when it comes to drinking?
I think it's true that we change our drinking habits depending on our context. Drinking is always socially contingent; there's a lot of conformity involved. If you go home to your old village and drink in the local pub with old school friends, you drink in a particular way that you might not with colleagues from your work. We are increasingly adept at being able to change our habits and tastes depending on context.

Is everyone pretending they like the same drinks for a sense of belonging, or do they genuinely like it, in a kind of mind-over-matter way?
Drinking alcohol, just like any other activity, is a learned, socialized process: we are taught how to drink at a certain age. I think we learn how to drink and, within that, our tastes and predispositions are shaped.

(Photo: Michal Žilinský)

The book you edited touches on the extreme metal music scene in Leeds. Are music tastes indicative of alcohol tastes?
The author of that chapter, Gabby Riches, was doing a wider ethnographic study of that subculture and she noticed how set and patterned the drinking habits were. It had to be real ale, beer or cider at these metal gigs. In certain subcultures and youth subcultures, alcohol can be as important as clothing in linking people together, and can symbolize an attitude—a sense of belonging to that subculture. We want to use all aspects of consumption to give ourselves a sense of self or identity, whether that's food or clothes or alcohol. This is central to my approach to studying alcohol.

Yeah, that whole real ale and craft beer scene doesn't seem to be going away.
The interesting thing about real ale is when you look at the branding it draws on images of the industrial era; small breweries often focus on local heritage and incorporate famous landmarks or local figures that are associated with the town or city they're from. They're using that, in a way, to offer a sense of reassurance; they're depicting the "glory era" of industrial Britain. People are clearly drawn to those types of ales in our current time of uncertainty and dislocation because these ales can give us a way of consuming locality in an interesting way. There's a growing trend of people liking the idea of something being made locally, instead of big companies that might feel faceless and corporate. In many ways, it is exciting and new, but it's a return to how things were historically, where the vast majority of the British population would have once been drinking what was local to them.

Where does drunkenness and the amount that people drink come into it?
Drunkenness has become really politicized over time. If we look at the contemporary situation, drunkenness is seen as threatening to the stability of society. The media has a fascination with portraying young people—and particularly working class drinkers—as deviant and problematic. In tabloid newspapers they'll have two dozen photos of 18-year-old students drunk and falling over, which pushes the idea of drunkenness as chaotic, disorderly and destabilizing. At the same time it perpetuates the idea that young people are irresponsible and naive. What is lacking from that is that some universities themselves encourage frosh week and frame it as alcohol-centric. Local pubs and bars will exploit that, too. The "studentification" of British towns and cities means that a lot of them are dependent on the student body to bring money into the town, usually spent in bars and clubs. It's a complex picture that is wider than simply blaming the individual for drinking too much, or too little, or in the wrong way.

What does this view of drunkenness say about our society?
Norbert Elias talked about a civilization process, where European societies have tended to move towards greater self-regulation and self-control. Arguably, the concerns about binge drinking are concerns about how society thinks about controlling itself. They are different things, alcohol and drunkenness. Modern societies develop out of a sense of control, rationality and bureaucracy; they tend to be ordered; and there tends to be high degrees of social control. The appeal of drunkenness is that it offers you a way out of that, a momentary escape from the mundane, the everyday.

I think the lives we lead when we are not drinking have an intimate relationship with how we approach drinking and whether we get drunk at the end of the week. It could be that the jobs available are increasingly precarious and poorly paid—in that case, who wouldn't want a drink on a Friday night to get some sort of release from the working week? If we continue to hammer this drum of "there are problem drinkers and it's their fault, it's their problem" I feel it doesn't get us very far. There are obviously some people who don't drink and some people who drink heavily, and every shade in between, but we can't abstract that from the social context.

(Photo: Michael Coté, via)

How much responsibility has the industry got for encouraging excessive drinking, or shaping drinking habits?
The industry is hugely important; the managers and owners of bars, and different alcoholic brands, they take conscious steps to keep people drinking. We talk about "high volume vertical" drinking, which is when a bar owner consciously takes out the tables and chairs from a bar or club because people will drink at a more rapid pace if they can't put their glass down and get lost in a conversation. Or the owners play music loud enough so that the drinkers can't have a conversation at all. The industry's branding of alcohol is selling it as something more than it really is. Carling as a brand has long positioned itself as a beer that is somehow a totem of male friendship. Their successful campaign of "You know who your mates are" was selling a moment with friends, homo-sociality, all males having a laugh and being part of a group. It should be quite clear that it is not the only strand and cause of changing drink practices, but it is significant and often forgotten about.

Big companies capitalizing on these types of things isn't anything new, right?
You're right, but I think we can benefit from reinstating it sometimes. Also, in some ways the industry actually struggles to have an influence. Over the years, with the closure of pubs, people try to pinpoint different reasons for this. Statistics show that young people are drinking less and there are more abstainers from alcohol now in the cohort between 18 and 25 than there have been in generations. Young people will use social media to promote the fact that they've just been to yoga class and are drinking a smoothie, rather than showing themselves getting drunk in a pub. They also may be limited by their finances.

How linked is the sociology of people's drinking habits to their eating habits?
I think there is a link there. When I asked real ale and craft brewers where they think the trend came from, they thought it was linked to people's move towards a different kind of eating. With many showing an interest in local produce, provenance, quality, artisan food, caring about what you eat, the flavors... the brewers thought that approach had seeped into their drinking habits. A lot of high street venues where you just stand and drink, they're struggling. The profits and the interesting developments in that field are at venues where they successfully combine these two trends: what people are drinking and eating.

What do you think the next trend in drinking will be?
I think craft beers will continue. In terms of changing trends and practises, people aren't going out as much—they're drinking at home and binge-watching box sets on Netflix, in the same way that when televisions first came into the living rooms of British homes it had an impact on regular pub-going. If I was to be brave I would say that the drinks industry, having watched the trend in healthy eating and clean living, might not be able to resist coming up with some beer that's maybe fortified with Goji berries, or green tea extract. I can see "smart booze" or fortified beer coming out, which is actually a return to how beer was historically seen, as wholesome and almost like a foodstuff. We could be going back to a "Guinness For Strength"—alcohol as nourishing and sustaining.

However, I can't see it working. A lot of people drink because they want an escape from control—a blowout at the end of the week where they don't have to worry about counting calories or how many kilometres they've walked on their Fitbit. I think alcohol will retain that appeal. It offers a space of spontaneity and fun, and for many people that isn't on offer in other areas of their lives. There's a common discourse that we're not meant to talk about the pleasures of drinking. I want to state unequivocally that there are huge dangers and damages that can be caused by heavy drinking—it ruins lives. But for many people, if we put the friendships, fun and pleasures of drinking against their struggles to get by in the world, I think they're very difficult to untangle.

@Jak_TH

How One Syrian Family Navigated the Weekend Airport Chaos

$
0
0

By the time Najah al-Shalmeih walked toward her family at the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport on Saturday night, at the end of her long trip from her native Syria, the crowd of protesters and supporters numbered in the dozens—and her son's emotions had grown beyond his ability to handle. Hisham Yasin cried as he embraced his mother and as the crowd cheered. Jubilant, he led them in a chant: "USA! USA! USA!"

Yasin kept chanting as he walked his mother—detained for nine hours despite having a US green card—toward a scrum of media wanting to get her story.

The grandmother opened her bag and gave her grandchildren candy.

Yasin, his wife, and their children made up one of at least nine families waiting for their loved ones who flew in on Emirates flight EK221 from Dubai. They were one of an untold number of people across the country who waited on Saturday to learn the fate of their family members and friends who had been detained following an executive order signed by Donald Trump on Friday night that banned travelers from seven majority-Muslim countries and temporarily suspended all refugee admissions. 

Over the weekend there was confusion about how the order was supposed to be interpreted—initially, the White House indicated that it would apply to lawful permanent residents of the US (a.k.a. green card holders, like al-Shalmeih) returning from these countries, but White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus seemed to contradict that on Sunday morning.

Unlike most of those in Dallas last night, Yasin was was able to leave the airport with some semblance of closure, his mother safely on the right side of a security barrier.

Samar Mustafa wasn't so lucky.

"I don't know how the president can just decide something like this and it can immediately happen," Mustafa told VICE.

Mustafa's mother, Shadia Osaman, could be seen lying down every time the doors opened to let people into the US side of the international terminal. "Go in there and get her mom out!" Mustafa's family yelled throughout the night. Osaman is from Sudan, which like Syria is one of the countries included in the executive order, and was traveling to Dallas to see her daughter and her granddaughter. As of midnight there was still no sign of her.

"If he knew this was going to happen, why didn't he say so before?" Mustafa asked of Trump. "Is this how it's going to be as president?"

Despite an order from a federal judge declaring a stay on Trump's executive order on Saturday night, Mustafa's mother remained in detention late Saturday night, as well as several other travellers on the flight from Dubai.

"No word," on them, Alia Salem of the local chapter of the Council on Islamic-American Relations, or CAIR, texted VICE late Saturday.

The families of nine detained passengers waited for hours to learn their fate. At one point, Yasin's oldest child, no more than five, began to offer candy to the growing group of family members, advocates, journalists, and attorneys. His younger brother slept in his Yasin's arms while another brother cried for a balloon that had gotten away. Salem put out the word to supporters and media. Men and women showed up and began making signs. Cameras arrived. Yasin and his family fretted nonetheless.

By the time his mother arrived, Yasin was beside himself. She emerged from the double glass doors in a white hijab, running and smiling at her daughter, Mariam, wearing a similar white silk hijab. They embraced and cried. For a moment in Terminal D on this strange night of fear and uncertainty there was joy.

That lasted only so long.

Mustafa approached Najah al-Shalmeih after she greeted her jubilant daughter. The 47-year-old wanted to know about her mother, detained on the other side for being from Sudan.

"Have you seen her? How is she doing?" Mustafa asked.

Mustafa was told that her mother was fine—though she hadn't been able to text her daughter for several hours due to a dead cell phone—and that she along with several others was waiting to hear her fate.

Everyone back there is tired, al-Shalmeih reported. They have been waiting for so long and have been sitting on chairs, some of them lying on the floor, going to sleep, al-Shalmeih said. But they are there, for now.

Al-Shalmeih made her way through the media scrum, past multiple interviews, and eventually out the door with her family. Salem stayed around waiting. Her daughter had brought flowers for her grandmother, visiting from Sudan for the first time in years.

"She brought flowers," Salem said of her daughter. "We have been here long enough that the flowers have died."

Photos of New Yorkers Protesting Trump's Muslim Ban at JFK Airport

$
0
0

Thousands of protesters descended on John F. Kennedy International Airport on Saturday in response to President Trump's executive order barring citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries for the next 90 days, and the admission of all refugees for 120 days.

Chants of "Let them in!" and "No hate, no fear, refugees are welcome here!" rang throughout Terminal 4 until late Saturday evening before New York federal judge, Ann Donnelly, ruled to block the deportation of refugees who had been detained at JFK overnight.

Amidst chaos and confusion, people took to social media to help fuel the city's swift response. The Women's March organizers were especially vocal about organizing resistance to the executive action at JFK as well as several other major airports across the country. An estimated 2.6 million people around the world joined the Women's March last weekend, displaying a forceful and historic solidarity between progressive organizations representing everything from DACA students to transgender equality to black economic empowerment to refugee rights.

See the photos over at Broadly.


Here’s How Much ‘Real News’ You Can Get from Celebrity Twitter Alone

$
0
0

Navigating online news media in 2017 is at best a disorienting experience. Teen Vogue is woke, most people only click on whatever pops up in their social feed, and if you ask the newest leader of the free world, apparently the New York Times is "fake news." Unfortunately for everyone, the people who have the massive followings necessary to reach wide audiences seem to rarely post about anything but themselves or the products they are getting paid to promote.

During the week leading up to Trump's inauguration and the Women's March on Washington there was sure to be no shortage of important news. In an effort to understand how much famous people spread real world information, I vowed to only receive my news exclusively through celebrity tweets.

I read the news constantly on a normal day. It's literally my job. I use a news aggregator app, and click a lot of articles from the liberal echo chamber that is my Facebook feed. I also try to fly away from the nest once in awhile to see what the other side's got going on. I visit pages like Fox News and watch Ezra Levant's ridiculously right-wing Rebel Media YouTube channel on a semi-regular basis.

As for Twitter, I'm an avid user. I use it way too much. Sometimes I catch myself with it open on my desktop and phone at the same time. I wasn't exactly looking forward to limiting my intake sources to actors, YouTubers, and pop stars, but I thought disconnecting from the constant, shitty Trump news that regularly fills my feed might be a necessary break.

After panicking for over an hour while trying to choose a new username, I got locked out of my account. I ended up with the handle @baeoblivion. With my Beyonce-floating-in-space header in place, I was ready to start following celebs. The sample size had to be limited yet broad in variety of political backgrounds, ages, and washed-upness.  

I tried taking on the mindset of a stereotypical millennial and immediately followed The Rock, Ariana Grande, Zayn Malik, Taylor Swift, Drake, and the entire Kardashian bloodline. After realizing how out of touch I am with millennial culture, I turned to this Forbes most followed list. Most of the celebs on the list didn't show propensity for posting political content, so I sought out politically-minded celebs like Tom Arnold, Alec Baldwin, Kirstie Alley, Mark Ruffalo, Tyler Oakley, Scott Baio, and of course, Cher.

DAY ONE: HONEYMOON

I'd discovered a whole new world, like a stay-at-home-mom discovering daytime soap operas for the first time. Tom Arnold seemed to never leave Twitter, constantly tweeting about the alleged tapes he had of Trump dropping an N-bomb, while also throwing some serious shade at Steven Seagal. Sinbad was getting into it with right-wing trolls. The Kardashians tweeted about their own shows, products, and family members. YouTubers tweeted about their latest videos. Mark Wahlberg put out a vague tweet of American pride that turned out to be a promo for his hammy new movie about the Boston Marathon bombings.

There were a couple people on my feed tweeting about things other than themselves. Fifth Hamony's Lauren Jauregui tweeted about the importance of saving Obamacare from repeal, though she didn't link to any articles so I had no way of knowing if there was any updates on the issue. Mark Ruffalo was one of the only celebs tweeting articles, RTing posts about the Women's March and offering ways for people to participate who live outside Washington.

On day one, I can't say I learned anything new, other than DJ Kahled was working on something "TOP SECRET" and Ariana Grande has a big dog.

DAY TWO: REGRET

The second day didn't get much better and I was starting to feel detached already, drawn to Twitter for the spectacle rather than for news. I already wanted to end this experiment. The trending section reminded me that it was Martin Luther King Jr. Day and celebs posted famous quotes to prove that they know who he is and that they aren't racist. Not all celebs though...

Rob Schneider was whitesplaining what Martin Luther King Jr. stood for to Rep. John Lewis, a civil rights leader. I got pretty upset at first, but then I realized I was taking Rob Schneider seriously, and that's a slippery slope.

Tom Arnold likely didn't sleep a fucking wink. He was still ranting about Trump in a stream of about 30 tweets that were very difficult to decipher. From what I gathered, Arnold had fake news reported about him that he was afraid of being assassinated for knowing about alleged Trump tapes.

I managed to find three good articles. Sinbad posted a link to a Huffington Post article about gun control, John Lewis, and a racist judge. The Hulk posted a link about protests against the Louisiana Access Pipeline, and a piece from CNN about Trump's nominee for Health and Human Services secretary.

On day two, I learned that Trump's cabinet was still filled with corrupt white dudes, and DJ Khaled was still "UP TO SOMETHING".

DAY THREE: GETTING THE HANG

The Rock was fucking pumped about his new Mustang, while Reese Witherspoon tweeted about her clothing line sale. Jaden Smith and Shia LaBeouf both tweeted "HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US," and I got excited because it meant Shia was up to something crazy again and I love him unabashedly, without irony or shame. This alone kept me coming back.

Despite the usual narcissism, there seems to be more news on the third day. Either that or I was getting better at sifting through the garbage. Leonardo DiCaprio tweeted a thanks to Obama, linking to an article about establishing new national monuments just days before he's out of office. Susan Sarandon tweeted a link to a BBC News piece about Obama pardoning Chelsea Manning. This felt like the first essential piece of news I'd read in three days and I remembered how much I was going to miss Obama.

Sarah Silverman's account was continually awesome. Not only funny, but informative and trying to speak sense to the entire political spectrum. She quoted a tweet from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the insane Wyoming bill that outlaws renewable energy. I was left wondering what other fucked up stuff the government was up to that I didn't know about yet so I dug a little deeper into my feed. Tom Arnold was STILL going off about the fucking tapes. Ugh. Not living his best life.  

On day three I felt I was actually able to get some decent news thanks to Sarah Silverman, Leo, and Ruffalo. I learned that Vincent D'Onofrio doesn't give a fuck what you think.

DAY FOUR: SETBACK

Just when I felt that I was getting some good news—very left-leaning albeit—the People's Choice Awards hit and my feed was nothing but congratulations and fashion photos for about 24 hours. There were a lot of people tweeting about The Rock, Kevin Hart, and Lilly Singh because she won some YouTuber award. I send her a congratulatory tweet in a sad attempt to connect. I get no response.

Tom Arnold got into a Twitter feud with Roseanne Barr, which put me back on the love side of our love/hate relationship.

On day four, I learned that the People's Choice Awards are still a thing, and Gary Busey sells dope "Buseyisms" on his website.

DAY FIVE: WORLD ON FIRE

People were still talking about the fucking People's Choice Awards that morning.

Kirstie Alley was the first celeb to tweet about the inauguration. She was excited for Trump, believing he will unite America. She's wrong. Russell Brand, who I used to think was rather intelligent, tweeted a nonsense new video he made comparing Trump and Obama that is almost impossible to comprehend because he insists on showcasing his unnecessary vocabulary.

Mark Ruffalo continued to be amazing on Twitter. Without him, I'd be lost. He was at the We Stand United pre-inauguration rally, which he linked to, and offered up his snapchat so you could follow along throughout the day. Unfortunately, I wasn't allowed to be on Snapchat.

I couldn't handle the lack of articles in my feed. I had a moment of weakness and switch over to my regular account. In excitement, I retweeted a VICE article about overdoses in Vancouver, BC. The person I RTd happened to be my editor. She immediately DMs me, telling me to get off my normal account. I apologize and begrudgingly go back to being @BaeOblivion.

On day five, Hulkamania ran wild on my childhood.

DAY SIX: INAUGURATION SHITSHOW

I was really worried I wouldn't catch President Sausage Skin's inauguration, but thankfully Twitter had their own livestream that I watched while taking in celeb reactions. The main accounts live-tweeting the event were Sarah Silverman and Kirstie Alley. Silverman's jokes were spot on, while Alley's praise for Trump was vague.

Britney Spears tweeted a photo of a dog.

The Shia Labeouf hype paid off. He launched an anti-Trump art project called "HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US" in New York that will last for the duration of Trump's presidency. It consisted of him chanting on a live stream with a horde of followers. I rejoiced, wishing I could be there.

Once again, Mark Ruffalo to the rescue. He was retweeting journalists and reporters, trusted sources all talking about the inauguration, the crowd size compared to Obama's, Mike Pence being a threat, and links to alternative programming.

On Trump's inauguration day I learned—Holy shit, he's really the President now and it was largely met with apathy in the celebrity world. Scott Baio loves good ol' American hot dogs.

DAY SEVEN: WOMEN'S MARCH AND THANK GOD THIS IS OVER

My Twitter experiment concluded on the same day as the Women's March, and my feed was inundated with posts of solidarity, photos of participation, and links to articles about crowd turnout. I was quite surprised that more people were tweeting about the peaceful protest than about the inauguration. It was uplifting to see so many celebrities standing in solidarity with plebeians around the world. The sad part is that based on what I've seen over the past week, most of them will not tweet about equality issues again until the next big event that demands them to show face.  

On day seven, I learned that more people showed up to protest Trump than showed up at his inauguration. DJ Khaled still doesn't want anyone to know about his "TOP SECRET" new album.

Over the course of the week, it was tough to get any real news. Even when celebrities were talking about current events, most of them didn't link to articles. While I was able to follow some major news stories, there were only a few accounts that delivered quality stories from reliable sources on a regular basis.

To nobody's surprise, most celebrities use their social media simply as another form of brand promotion. I'm not naive enough to believe it's anyone's inherent duty to use their power and influence on social media for the betterment of mankind, but I do wish some more celebrities had the balls to post informative content and fight against the polluted media landscape of 2017. In the eternal words of President Trump, "There should be nothing you should be ashamed of" when posting on Twitter.

Follow Lonnie on Twitter.

Dieser Roadtrip zeigt die Natur Kanadas von ihrer schönsten Seite

$
0
0

Ich bin zwar schon einmal quer durch Kanada gefahren, aber damals hatte ich nur Zeit für die bekannten Postkartenmotive. Vergangenen Sommer wollte ich mich nicht noch mal so stressen lassen. Also kauften mein Freund und ich ein Wohnmobil und zusammen mit unserem Hund brachen wir ohne Geld und ohne Plan zu einem viermonatigem Roadtrip auf. Das Highlight? Fast alles zwischen den Highlights – egal ob nun das unheimliche Kleinstädtchen oder die Nordlichter, die einen Streit mit meinem Freund verhinderten. Nach vier Jahren als Nomadin war es doch sehr cool, meiner kleinen brasilianischen Familie zeigen zu können, wie atemberaubend Kanada wirklich ist.

Mehr von Stephanie Fodens Arbeiten findest du auf ihrer Website .


Folge VICE auf Facebook, Instagram und Snapchat.

Samantha Bee Is Going to Roast Trump at the 'Not White House Correspondents' Dinner'

$
0
0

The White House Correspondents' Dinner is sort of like the Oscars of DC. The event, which started as a way to foster relationships between the press and members of the president's administration, usually features a comedian host that tries their best to make topical jokes without coming across like a total jerk. This year, however, there might not be a dinner, due to Trump's "running war" with the media and his inability to laugh at himself

To make sure that Trump does get the roasting he deserves, comedian Samantha Bee announced Monday that she will host an alternative to the traditional event, which she's calling the "Not White House Correspondents' Dinner." It's set to feature performances from various comedians and will take place at the Willard Hotel in Washington, DC, on April 29, the same night and just a few miles away from where the actual event is scheduled to take place. 

"Samantha Bee, noted purveyor of FAKE NEWS™, will host the gala affair, welcoming journalists and non-irritating celebrities from around the world," TBS said in a press release Monday. "We suspect some members of the press may find themselves unexpectedly free that night, and we want to feed them and give them hugs."

In recent years, the White House Correspondents' Dinner has evolved into a star-studded affair and has been criticized by media figures like Tom Brokaw for blurring the ethical line between the president and the journalists tasked with covering him objectively. After a scathing column by Frank Rich in 2007, the New York Times stopped sending its reporters to the dinner.

The Full Frontal with Samantha Bee host told the New York TimesTrump's bête noire—that she wanted to bring like-minded comics together in case the decades-old event doesn't happen this year. It's not clear which reporters will attend, or who will perform, but Bee plans to donate all the proceeds from the night to the Committee to Protect Journalists. It will also air on TBS sometime after the taping.

"The evening is sure to bring plenty of surprises, music, food and laughter—and if you're not careful you just might learn something," Bee said in the statement. "Specifically, you'll learn how screwed we'd be without a free press."

While the comedians tasked with hosting the event lightly rib the president and members of his administration, they've gotten more critical over the last few years, like when Stephen Colbert made President George W. Bush visibly uncomfortable when he served as host in 2006. It's almost certain that Bee will make Trump uncomfortable with her jokes on the night of the Not Correspondents' Dinner, though he likely won't be in attendance. 

Tomando ginebra con Snoop Dogg

$
0
0

Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en Munchies, nuestra plataforma de comida. 

Pocos artistas gozan del poder de resistencia que tiene Snoop Dogg. Casi 25 años desde el debut de su novedoso álbum Doggystyle, el cantante, estrella de televisión y empresario de la mariguana medicinal es tan relevante culturalmente como nunca. Parte de ello tiene que ver con su naturaleza prolífica (lanzó 127 singles durante ese par de décadas y media), pero la contagiosa amabilidad de Snoop seguramente juega un papel importante en su éxito continuo. Después de todo, la gentileza nunca pasa de moda.

Por cierto, tampoco la mariguana. El título, todo menos oficial, de Snoop como embajador internacional de la mota también ha ayudado a fomentar su legado. MUNCHIES contactó a Snoop para sentarnos en el centro de LA a beber cócteles de ginebra con jugo, y nos reveló todo, desde sus snacks favoritos para drogarse hasta la persona que puede fumar más que él. Lo más importante durante esta sesión con el ícono del hip-hop es que nos ofreció algunas lecciones de vida.

MUNCHIES: ¿Qué estamos bebiendo?
Snoop Dogg: Sabes, Martha Stewart me preparó esta misma bebida para mi programa [Es el cóctel Laid Back preparado por Niko Novick de N2 Mixology, una parte de ginebra, otra de vodka de manzana, dos de jugo de piña y un toque de agua mineral, en las rocas]. Pero le puso una bola de hielo dentro. Una bola enorme. Una bola hija de puta; nunca había bebido algo con una bola tan grande. Me jodió, pero el trago es bueno. Nunca imaginé que diría que me gustan las bolas, pero… Tienes que poner el gin, un poco de piña y picar picar el hielo.

Tu amistad con Martha es inusual pero genuina. ¿Cómo trabajan juntos?
Es diferente, sabes, a lo que estoy acostumbrado. Pero también es tan parecida, porque es una persona normal. Se ve diferente y nació en una época diferente, pero si sales con ella y te relajas, es como cualquier otra persona. Por eso funciona, porque nunca dice nada loco para mis oídos. Siempre pienso, Sabía que dirías eso, OK. Por eso nos llevamos bien, por eso hay conexión con Martha. Es como el matrimonio sagrado y no unos macarrones sagrados.

Introdujiste una nueva generación al mundo de la coctelería cuando sacaste tu canción "Gin and Juice". ¿Quién te mostró esa bebida?
¡Mi mamá! Mi mamá era asidua bebedora en los 70. Solían hacer fiestas en la sala de la casa, teníamos un bar con un tocacintas de 8 tracks. Tomaban ginebra y se la pasaban bien, de fiesta. Representaba un buen momento.

¿Qué música recuerdas de aquella época?
The Dramatics, Marvin Gaye, Isley Brothers, Manhattans. Todo lo que te ponía a bailar, ¿sabes lo que digo? Ellos y mamá bailaban. El alcohol los hacía bailar a mis ojos. Ahora que lo pienso, siempre tenían un vaso lleno. Usaban vasos rojos o de unicel, pero siempre tenían un vaso.

¿Siempre fue ginebra para ti? Hay muchas personas en la escena rap que beben cognac.
Nunca bebí el "trago oscuro"… porque ya soy suficientemente oscuro. Beber demasiado cognac no es bueno. Las peores crudas son con el cognac. Esas que te dejan diciendo, "Oh dios, nunca volveré a beber". Nunca te dan así con los espíritus claros. Quiero intentarlo otra vez.

¿Cuál es la bebida perfecta para fiestas?
¡Oh! Pink Panties (una mezcla de limonada rosa, ginebra, helado, fresas y hielo]. No creo que sigan preparándolos. Cuando pasé de la secundaria a la preparatoria, ésa era la bebida que las chicas sexys preparaban cuando querían coquetear, pero te preparaban el trago, te embriagaban y ¡nunca conseguías nada!

¿Qué tienes planeado para 2017, Snoop?
Hay una película por salir para Coolaid. Creo que ese álbum es muy bueno. Sentía que volaba. Me parece que no estuvo bien manejado por la compañía disquera. Así que grabé una película para ayudarlos a entender de qué se trataba. La película está por estrenarse en marzo. Estoy trabajando con muchos artistas fascinantes. October London es uno. Es un gran cantante/letrista. Hacer un par de cosas con mi hija, ahora es cantante. Acabo de terminar el álbum Morris Day, así que estén atentos. También trabajaremos en el nuevo disco de Bootsy Collins. Tratando de unirnos y crear, haciendo un poco de todo eso. Amo hacer música, amo ofrecer lo que les faltaba a muchos artistas que crecí amando y hoy puedo trabajar con ellos, porque aún quieren hacer música y yo sigo queriendo trabajar con ellos.

Ahora dejas que otros artistas escriban canciones para ti. ¿Cómo es el proceso?
Dejo que la gente escriba para mí, porque —no es que esté estancado o no tenga cerebro para eso— es solo que a veces la perspectiva de fuera es mejor que la propia. Han sido algunas canciones… "Sexual Eruption", esa canción la escribió Shorty Rare. Me presentó esa canción y dijo, "Quiero que tengas esta canción". Pero no estaba cantando, solo hablaba. La tome, puse el autotune con mi voz y dije, "Espera. No quiero fingir la voz como T-Pain. Así que pon a T-Pain aquí y a mí acá". Esa es la diferencia entre canciones con autotunes regulares y la nuestra, porque Shorty Rare me dio esta canción. La escribió, la produjo e hizo los arreglos, yo sólo agregué mi toque e hice lo que hago.

Pero no siempre estuviste cómodo con gente que escribía para ti.
Tenía problemas con eso al principio, porque yo controlaba el micrófono. Ya sabes, ¡un adicto al micrófono! Escribía para Dr. Dre. Yo escribía para él. Tú no vas a escribir para mí. Un rapero —no puedo decir su nombre— y yo tuvimos una pelea por eso. "¡No puedes escribir para mí, negro!" Pero terminaba vendiendo millones y millones y millones de discos. Se ganó mi respeto. En el arte de la guerra, yo seguía estando en la cima, así que no necesitaba coescritores. Yo era mi propio socio.

Snoop con el bartender Niko Novick. Foto por Jared Ranahan.

Estás relacionado con el mundo de la mariguana medicinal. ¿Cómo te sientes con la proliferación de los comestibles, en particular?
No tengo una postura respecto a los comestibles. Agradezco el hecho de que estén creando comestibles porque a algunas personas no les gusta fumar y no les gusta el olor, así que los comestibles son una alternativa para medicarte. También es una manera genial de hacerte sentir bien acerca de lo que estás haciendo sin que nadie lo sepa. Respeto eso, pero al mismo tiempo yo no uso comestibles, porque no puedo controlarlo. Pierdo el control de todo cuando lo hago, porque entra al torrente sanguíneo, está por todo mi cuerpo y no me gusta sentirme así.

¿Qué hay de la legalización en tu estado natal, California?
El mundo está interesado en eso ahora. El mundo está más medicado que ocupado. Así que tienes que considerar que cura a la gente, está salvando al mundo. Como siempre digo, hasta esto [señala el vaso de alcohol sobre la mesa]: ve a un evento deportivo y observa cómo actúa la gente; violenta, agresiva. Si el equipo pierde habrá peleas. Pero cuando vas a un evento deportivo y hace esto [hace un gesto con la mano fingiendo fumar], no vas a meterte con nadie. Si tu equipo pierde… al diablo, ellos perdieron.

Wiz Khalifa recientemente afirmó que puede fumar más que tú. ¿Hay algo de cierto en eso?
Wiz Khalifa no puede fumar más que yo. Es joven y aspiracional. Está en una misión. Su karate es bueno, pero nunca podría hacerlo. Actualmente solo hay una persona que lo ha hecho: Willie Nelson. Es la única persona que ha podido fumar más que yo. ¡Finito!

¿Cómo sabes que alguien fuma más que tú?
Cuando quieres parar. Cuando buscas una salida. Tratas de romper la cadena. Es una rotación, gira como la unión de canciones. Y de pronto alguien te da la batuta y piensas, "Seguiré y me quedaré aquí mientras ustedes se acaban eso".

En tu programa con Martha, demuestras una destreza impresionante para cocinar. ¿Qué comida te gustaría preparar mientras estás drogado?
Uno de los mejores snacks es la boloña frita con queso, luego echas tus papas fritas favoritas. Es lo básico.

¿Cómo les enseñas a tus hijos a beber y fumar responsablemente?
Ninguno de mis hijos bebe. ¿Pero fumar responsablemente? Solo trato de ser un ejemplo. No ser hipócrita. ¿Cómo puedo decirles que no lo hagan, cuando yo lo hago? Lo hago de forma respetuosa. No soy irrespetuoso. Cada vez que entro a un edificio con un churro, es porque puedo hacerlo. Si te diste cuenta hoy, no has olido mariguana aquí adentro, porque respeto la visión de la ocasión. Pero puedo ser un idiota si lo necesito, pero éste no es el lugar ni la hora. Esto son negocios, trajes y corbatas.

¿Cómo ha evolucionado tu relación con la mariguana a través de los años?
Es medicina. Miro a mi alrededor y veo a todos los artistas, raperos, atletas, cómo tienen problemas de peso e imagen, no pueden lidiar con tendencias suicidas, violencia doméstica, esto y aquello. Pero Snoop Dogg solo sigue su dieta estricta: esto y aquello, nada más. Cuando mezclas todo lo anterior, obtienes esos problemas. Pero si mantienes las cosas pequeñas, dulces y simples, consigues un camino suave por el que puedes caminar, estoy sobre él justo ahora.

Gracias por hablar con nosotros.

Why You'll Never Change Anyone's Mind About Politics

$
0
0

The question of how to change a mind—or get someone to hop the political fence—has likely never been more important, or discussed more frequently, than in today's age. Last year, despite a constant series of bombshells about Donald Trump's evasion of taxes, allegations of sexual assault, racism and xenophobia, and his ties to Russian leader Vladimir Putin, the billionaire reality star was—with stunning support—elected to highest office in the world, based almost entirely on egregious lies, political theatrics, and unhinged emotion.

Almost 400 years earlier, renowned English philosopher Francis Bacon published one of his most notable pieces of work— Novum Organum. Within it, Bacon made a statement that, when viewed through the correct lens, reflects the modern climate of political debate quite perfectly.

"Once a human intellect has adopted an opinion (either as something it likes or as something generally accepted), it draws everything else in to confirm and support it," Bacon wrote, describing the phenomena now widely described as "confirmation bias" or "the backfire effect."

"Even if there are more and stronger instances against it than there are in its favor, the intellect either overlooks these or treats them as negligible or does some line-drawing that lets it shift them out of the way and reject them."

Imaging results from Kaplan's study show high activity in regions of the brain associated with emotion and identity when participants were challenged on political belief.

Since then, scientists have dedicated a lot of time to studying human psychology and the way in which people accept convenient lies. Last month, a paper published in Scientific Reports detailed the way in which humans, when challenged with facts that dispute their own conceptions of the truth, actually become more entrenched in their political belief—not less.

The study tested participants in two ways: first, it presented statements to the participants that were devoid of politics. "Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb," for example, was one such statement. For the most part, participants agreed—citing the history they were taught in school and the commonly-held belief that Edison really did create the light bulb.

The researches presented seven more statements similar to this, and then presented evidence that contradicted each statement.

"Edison might have patented the lightbulb, but there were earlier examples of others who had created forms of lighting via electricity long before Edison made the incandescent," Jonas Kaplan, lead author of the study, told me, describing an example of conflicting evidence presented to the participants. When presented with this evidence— which Kaplan notes is actually untrue and purposely misleading—most participants reported to have changed their belief that Edison was the principal inventor of the light bulb.

"In some way, we were able to convince them of complete lies," Kaplan told me. "We found that [the participants] almost always saw the other side as a revelation, and not an insult to their intelligence."

The second portion of the study involved the same process of eight statements and eight conflicting arguments—except, this time, the statements were political.

"The US should reduce its military spending"—just one example Kaplan described—set off a reactionary response in subjects, which were recorded via MRI scans of the participants' brains.

"With the political portion of the study, we saw lots of activity in the amygdala and insular cortex. These are the parts of brain heavily associated with emotion, feelings, and ego," Kaplan says. "Identity is inherently political, so when people feel like their identity is being attacked or challenged, they seize up."

Data from the Kaplan's study

All of the political statements, Kaplan says, were crafted to emotionally incite liberal-minded participants. The researchers (including popular left-wing author and journalist Sam Harris, and Kaplan's colleague Sarah Gimbel) purposely recruited from the Los Angeles area, and screened participants for left-leaning beliefs via self-reported opinion tests.

"I would really like to see what the response would be on the conservative side of the spectrum—just for the sake of it—but the fundamental problem here, I imagine at least, would still be the same."

Obviously, this can be problematic for any politician or political movement trying to make progress (or at least find some common ground with their opponent). Prime example: during both of Barack Obama's terms as president, the Republicans were chastised for creating a self-induced gridlock of legislative sessions through excessive walkouts and overuse of filibusters. In fact, there was such little compromise in the last eight years that the 112th and the 113th congresses have been labeled the two least productive congressional assignments in the history of the United States.

As Mark Longabaugh (formerly chief strategist for the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign) tells me, the modern state of political debate is much like a "cage match of emotions." Policy, once a primary weapon in the ring, is now merely a warm-up for the real siege weapons to win hearts and minds—personality, controversy, and, as Sanders learned in his uphill battle against Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, name recognition.

Longabaugh notes that, while Sanders movement ultimately shaped much of the Democratic Party's new platform, many Democrat voters simply could not convince themselves that anyone but Clinton was the candidate for the job. She was, as Longabaugh puts it, the "safe and sure" bet to many, despite the fact that Sanders brought both the progressive policy and fiery prose that could combat Trump's twisted populism.

"If you think about the two candidates who had the biggest impact on their respective parties last election, it was Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. They both had a narrative to tell, and that's the one thing that [Clinton] ultimately failed to tap into," Longabaugh says.

"When Bernie first announced his run, media across the country labeled him as a joke—completely uninspiring. What in fact happened was the opposite. Mr. Sanders had a message—that the working, middle class of his country was suffering and that economic inequality was, in many ways, at the heart of a lot of [American] problems...[Trump], as much as I disagree with him on many things, retained that core economic narrative. He told people there was a problem very simply, and stuck to a vague argument that he would fix it."

Ultimately, however, Longabaugh says that the future of politics is not about changing minds. Rather, it's about getting those who are undecided to join the right side of history in the first place. In context of the election, he points to swing voters—those who either didn't vote, or voted third-party—as the real focus for political campaigns going forward.

A somewhat dreary statement in some ways—an argument that old dogs can't be taught new tricks, and established conservative or liberal voters can't be simply moved from party lines by throwing conventional issues at them. Still, Longabaugh doesn't see it that way. He's actually quite optimistic.

"We don't need to change minds," he tells me, noting the spike in millennials who turned out for Sanders during the primaries as a source of hope for the future. "The real tragedy here isn't that we can't convince opponents to join our side. That has never, and will never be, the ideal political environment. We need opposing minds to find compromise, and we need young people to believe that can happen."

Lead illustration by Jane Kim.

Follow Jake Kivanc on Twitter.

Viewing all 425 articles
Browse latest View live